![]() This causes a lot of folks to shout at us, especially with regard to HTML/CSS. Plus there’s the eternal struggle between “lumping” and “splitting”-is it best to focus on similarities and thus put multiple things under fewer labels overall, or focus on differences and break things up as much as possible and have more fine-grained labels?įor us this question starts with considering just what is a programming language. But for now let’s just all agree to not run any, say, nuclear reactors with a Web app, okay?)Ĭreating the rankings also pulls us into the typical dilemmas faced by any taxonomist-you might think you’ve got a straightforward and unambiguous way to classify things, but then edge cases and weird hybrids invariably slither into view. Quite apart from making the app large, and thus slower to load, we also ran into the problem that different browsers could produce slightly different results, thanks to variations in floating-point implementations! (This problem of different implementations giving different results was largely solved by the IEEE-754 standard for floating-point numbers, so it would be interesting to go back and find out which browser versions are noncompliant. Taking it out allows us to precompute the preset rankings instead of serving an app that contained the data from all the metrics and then computed the rankings in the browser on the fly. However, it turned out that very few people were taking advantage of this feature. In previous years, we allowed readers to bypass these preset rankings and create a custom ranking by adjusting the weights however they pleased. The raw data is normalized and weighted according to the different rankings offered-for example, the Spectrum default ranking is heavily weighted toward the interests of IEEE members, while Trending puts more weight on forums and social-media metrics. Sources include GitHub, Google, Stack Overflow, Twitter, and IEEE Xplore. A complete list of our sources is here, but in a nutshell we look at nine metrics that we think are good proxies for measuring what languages people are programming in. Job listings are of course not the only metrics we look at in Spectrum. But many of the job listings calling for expertise in assembly were posted by the kinds of low-profile cybersecurity contractors that orbit Washington, D.C., and even one government agency-the NSA. Previously, I generally just associated assembly code with things like device drivers, tweaking the guts of operating systems, or retrocomputing. Looking at complete jobs listings also shows that if you’re interested in cyberwarfare (both offensive and defensive), then getting handy with assembly code is a pretty good in. So it may not be the most glamorous language or what you’re going to use to implement the next Great Algorithm, but some experience with SQL is a valuable arrow to have in your quiver. (For more on the rise of SQL, see our accompanying article.) And even when a networked back end isn’t practical, embedded and single-board computers can be found with enough oomph to run a SQL database locally. Why reinvent the wheel and try to hack your own database and accompanying network interface protocol when so many SQL implementations are available? Chances are there’s probably already one that fits your use case. This is likely because so many applications today involve a front-end or middleware layer talking to a back-end database, often over a network to eliminate local resource constraints. It may not be the most glamorous language.but some experience with SQL is a valuable arrow to have in your quiver. Having looked through literally hundreds and hundreds of job listings in the course of compiling these rankings for you, dear reader, I can say that the strength of the SQL signal is not because there are a lot of employers looking for just SQL coders, in the way that they advertise for Java experts or C++ developers. 1 in our Jobs ranking, which looks solely at metrics from the IEEE Job Site and CareerBuilder. Java also remains popular, as does Javascript, the latter buoyed by the ever-increasing complexity of websites and in-browser tools (although it’s worth noting that in some quarters, the cool thing is now deliberately stripped-down static sites built with just HTML and simple CSS).īut among these stalwarts is the rising popularity of SQL. Indeed, the combined popularity of C and the big C-like languages- C++ and C#-would outrank Python by some margin. Python remains on top but is closely followed by C.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |